Carlat vs Stossel: Little Learned

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Finger_wagging.jpg
Harvard physician Tom Stossel and psychiatrist Daniel Carlat recently debated the Massachusetts Senate ban on pharma gifts to physicians. Unfortunately, the 7-minute discussion (hosted by New England Cable News) was given the typical short shrift by TV-based media and did not include input from informed economic or legal perspectives.

However, in the brief time provided, Stossel did attempt to consider the unintended and uninvestigated consequences of banning low-ticket pharma gifts (eg, pens, notepads, sandwiches), such as the loss of state business and jobs. It is important to note that there is little-to-no evidence indicating that such gifts negatively affect physician behavior or health care outcomes. Stossel also indicated that the ban may limit pharma funding to state institutions for research.

On the other hand, Daniel Carlata proponent of banning all pharma gifts and pharma-funded CMEwould have you believe that physicians are incapable of autonomous judgment and should, therefore, be subject to his non-evidence-based gut morality.

Photo: iStockPhoto.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Carlat vs Stossel: Little Learned.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://bmartinmd.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/213

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by bmartin published on June 4, 2008 4:37 PM.

Apropos-of-Nothing Wednesday: #16 was the previous entry in this blog.

"Green Our Vaccines": It Rhymes, Sort Of is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

J&R Computer/Music World Pay a penny for shipping on orders $99 or more Add to Technorati Favorites
Powered by Movable Type 4.01